Sumner Street Home Hardware Elon 4/5" Centre Bar Pull
Intel Core i5-12400 Review: Alder Lake's Gaming Coup De Grace
Intel hasn't officially appear the $199 Cadre i5-12400 and the chips aren't supposed to exist available at retail yet, merely that didn't stop united states of america from snagging a chip and putting it to the exam. Nosotros found that the Alder Lake Core i5-12400 delivers a stunning level of performance in our CPU benchmarks, beating all comparable Ryzen chips and even several of the more than expensive models. Furthermore, with the right tuning, it's even faster at gaming than the previous-gen $549 Core i9-11900K flagship, raising the bar for mid-range gaming chips as it joins our list of the Best CPUs for gaming.
Intel's 65W Core i5 SKUs have long been the visitor'due south all-time mid-range chips for gamers. The Core i5-12400, though currently non officially appear, is expected to land with a similar $185 recommended toll as its predecessor. The half dozen-core i5-12400'southward strong combination of price and performance, not to mention a reportedly vastly-improved stock cooler, will dominate the $170 to $200 toll range.
AMD abandoned the sub-$200 marketplace when it launched its Ryzen 5000 processors, leaving its older processors to hold the line. Oddly enough, the aging Ryzen 5 3600X and 3600 volition remain the become-to competitors for the 12400 even though they debuted near 2 and a one-half years agone. Certain, AMD released the Ryzen 5 3600XT a year later, but the overpriced XT fries barely brought any meaningful operation improvements and remain difficult to find.
For now, AMD'south lowest signal of entry into its Zen 3-powered Ryzen 5000 serial comes in the course of the $259 Ryzen 5 5600G. This APU is the all-time value on the market if you're looking to game at lower resolutions without a discrete GPU. Only aside from gaming on the iGPU, information technology tin't compete with the Core i5-12400 and comes at a far college price betoken.
| Price | Cores | Threads | P-Core Base/Boost | E-Cadre Base/Boost | TDP / PBP / MTP | DDR4-3200 | L3 Cache | |
| Core i9-12900K / KF | $589 (K) - $564 (KF) | 8P + 8E | 16 Cores / 24 Threads | 3.two / 5.two GHz | 2.4 / three.9 GHz | 125W / 241W | DDR4-3200 / DDR5-4800 | 30MB |
| Core i7-12700K / KF | $409 (One thousand) - $384 (KF) | 8P + 4E | 12 Cores / twenty Threads | 3.6 / 5.0 GHz | 2.7 / 3.8 GHz | 125W / 190W | DDR4-3200 / DDR5-4800 | 25MB |
| Core i5-12600K / KF | $289 (K) - $264 (KF) | 6P + 4E | ten Cores / 16 Threads | 3.seven / 4.nine GHz | 2.viii / 3.6 GHz | 125W / 150W | DDR4-3200 / DDR5-4800 | 16MB |
| Cadre i5-12400 / F | $192-$199 | $167-$174 (F) | 6P + 0E | 6 Cores / 12 Threads | 4.4 / ~2.5 GHz | n/a | 65W / 117W | DDR4-3200 / DDR5-4800 | 18MB |
That leaves Intel unchecked in the value segment, adding to the company's newfound authorization with the Alder Lake fries that fifty-fifty outperform more than expensive Ryzen 5000 chips. Every bit we tin run across with the $589 Core i9-12900K vs $799 Ryzen ix 5950X, the $408 Core i7-12700K vs $549 Ryzen 9 5900X, and the $289 Core i5-12600K vs $390 Ryzen 7 5800X (click the links for the full rundown), Alder Lake truly punches above its pricing weight class.
However, platform pricing has been a sore bespeak for the Alder Lake family unit. While Intel's chips are less expensive than AMD's, the company currently merely has its expensive Z690 motherboards on offer, reducing its value proposition for the lower-end processors. However, that'south rumored to modify later this week when B660 motherboards come up to marketplace, providing a great pairing for the Core i5-12400 and easing platform pricing concerns.
Surprisingly, Alder Lake's operation advantages come fifty-fifty without its support for DDR5 memory and PCIe 5.0 interfaces (both of which Intel brought to market outset). You lot can use standard DDR4 memory and PCIe four.0 devices to unlock superior functioning over AMD's aging AM4 platform. We doubtable that most B- and H-serial boards will leverage less-expensive DDR4 memory due to ongoing DDR5 shortages, so a Cadre i5 system paired with a B660 motherboard could be the killer value philharmonic.
Alder Lake also brings another innovation — the hybrid x86 blueprint represents the visitor's virtually confusing architectural shift in a decade. The higher-finish Alder Lake chips combine big and fast Functioning cores (P-cores) with clusters of small and powerful Efficiency cores (E-cores) that chew through groundwork processes. The Aureate Cove compages powers the 'large' P-cores, while the 'little' E-cores come with the Gracemont architecture.
However, the Core i5-12400 doesn't take a hybrid architecture. Instead, information technology comes with a more than traditional design and only has six P-Cores active, so information technology doesn't utilise Gracemont-based cores for background tasks. That ways this six-core 12-thread processor doesn't need Intel'due south new Windows 11-exclusive Thread Manager technology to place workloads on the correct cores. As a outcome, different Intel's hybrid models, the 12400 is only every bit potent in Windows 10 equally it is in Windows 11.
As you'll encounter in our benchmarks below, the 65W Core i5-12400 is a stellar gaming chip that easily outperforms all of AMD'south competing fries. In fact, the $185 Core i5-12400 is faster than the $299 Ryzen v 5600X in gaming. Later on tuning, the 12400 is also faster than the Core i9-11900K at gaming, courtesy of Intel'due south memory overclocking support on B-series motherboards. Overall, the Core i5-12400 is the uncontested new mid-range gaming champ.
This is a review of an unreleased product, so we don't take all the official details yet. Just nosotros accept the chip, which tells us everything we demand to know about operation. We also tested the 12400 with overclocked memory and unlimited power settings, which provides a overnice bit of uplift. Then permit's take a quick look at the specs we know, then go to the benchmarks.
Intel Alder Lake-S Cadre i5-12400 Specifications and Pricing
| Cost | Cores | Threads | P-Cadre Base/Heave | Due east-Core Base/Boost | TDP / PBP / MTP | Memory Support | L3 Cache | |
| Core i7-12700K / KF | $409 (Grand) - $384 (KF) | 8P + 4E | 12 Cores / 20 threads | 3.half-dozen / 5.0 GHz | ii.seven / three.8 GHz | 125W / 190W | DDR4-3200 / DDR5-4800 | 25MB |
| Ryzen seven 5800X | $449 | 8P | xvi threads | 3.viii / 4.7 GHz | - | 105W | DDR4-3200 | 32MB |
| Cadre i5-12600K / KF | $289 (K) - $264 (KF) | 6P + 4E | 10 Cores / 16 threads | 3.7 / 4.9 GHz | ii.8 / 3.half-dozen GHz | 125W / 150W | DDR4-3200 / DDR5-4800 | 16MB |
| Ryzen 5 5600X | $299 | 6P | 12 threads | 3.7 / iv.6 GHz | - | 65W | DDR4-3200 | 32MB |
| Ryzen 5 5600G | $259 | 6 / 12 | 3.nine / 4.4 | - | 65W | DDR4-3200 | 16MB |
| Core i5-12400 / F | $192-$199 | $167-$174 (F) | 6P + 0E | half dozen Cores / 12 Threads | 4.4 / ~2.5 GHz | n/a | 65W / 117W | DDR4-3200 / DDR5-4800 | 18MB |
| Core i5-11400 / F | $182 - $157 | 6 / 12 | 2.6 / four.2 | - | 65W | DDR4-2933 | 12MB |
| Ryzen 5 3600X | $240 | 6 / 12 | 3.viii / iv.4 | - | 95W | DDR4-3200 | 32MB |
| Ryzen 5 3600 | $200 | half dozen / 12 | iii.half-dozen / 4.2 | - | 65W | DDR4-3200 | 32MB |
All Alder Lake chips back up DDR4-3200 or upwardly to DDR5-4800 memory, merely caveats use. PCIe back up volition vary by motherboard, but Alder Lake chips expose up to 16 lanes of PCIe 5.0 (technically for storage and graphics only, no networking devices) and an additional four lanes of PCIe 4.0 from the chip for Thousand.2 storage.
Nosotros don't have the full official specs for the Cadre i5-12400 yet. Instead, we're relying upon what we've seen in numerous leaks and what we've observed in our examination environment. The 12400 comes with a 65W PBP (base) and 117W MTP (elevation) power rating. We clocked the chip running at a two.five GHz base and boosting up to 4.4 GHz. The flake likewise comes with 18 MB of L3 enshroud.
The Core i5-12400 is a locked scrap, significant it isn't overclockable. However, Intel supports memory overclocking on Z690 and B660 motherboards (Z690 doesn't brand sense for this class of chip, though). As you'll soon see, manipulating the power limits serves as a quasi-overclock that tin can eke out some additional performance in some gaming and threaded work.
The standard Cadre i5-12400 comes with the UHD Graphics 730 engine with 24 EUs. We clocked it running at 300 / 1400 MHz base of operations/boost frequencies. If you lot're looking to salvage some coin, the graphics-less Cadre i5-12400F volition come with a $25 price reduction (if tradition holds) and have the same specs as the 12400, which is incredibly bonny if y'all plan on using a discrete graphics card. Notably, y'all will lose Quick Sync capabilities and the iGPU fallback that y'all can use for troubleshooting in the event of an outcome with a discrete GPU. Yet, in that location also isn't an selection for graphics on AMD's cost-comparable Ryzen v 3600X and 3600.
The $289 Cadre i5-12600K comes equally the next footstep up the Alder Lake ladder. Information technology comes with six threaded P-cores that operate at three.7 / iv.9 GHz and 4 Eastward-cores that run at 2.8 / iii.half dozen GHz, for a total of 16 threads. That'due south paired with 20MB of L3 and 9.5MB of L2 cache. Naturally, overclockability is a big attraction with the 12600K, but you shouldn't underestimate the E-cores — they provide quite a fleck more heft in threaded work, helping the 12600K earn its higher toll tag.
Intel's Alder Lake drops into Socket 1700 motherboards from the 600-series, including Z690, H670, B660, and H610. The latter 3 are expected to be announced this calendar week.
Cadre i5-12400 Dice Details
MSI recently confirmed via a livestream that Intel uses two dissimilar dies for the Alder Lake series: One die has eight P-cores and viii East-cores (8P+8E), and some other has but 6 P-cores (vi+0). Obviously, the latter die is much smaller and thus more price-effective, therefore making far more than sense for use in the not-hybrid Alder Lake fries with six or fewer cores.
However, leaked testing indicates that the Cadre i5-12400 chips vary on a flake-to-flake basis and can come with either die blazon. That means C0 stepping chips like ours actually take a total of eight P-cores and 8 E-cores, but Intel disables the extra cores to trim information technology down to a half-dozen+0 blueprint. Naturally, that helps the visitor sell larger dies that encounter defects during manufacturing. It could also help improve supply and manufacturing efficiency when there aren't plenty 'perfect' defect-free 6+0 dies available.
The physical difference between the dies — the 8P+8E design's ring motorcoach extends to cover the disabled E-cores and P-Cores — implies that the H0-stepping 6+0 dies will accept lower core-to-core latencies. That could theoretically lead to slightly faster performance under sure conditions. Additionally, anecdotal evidence also suggests that the H0 fries require less power. We're working to source an H0 flake for comparison and will follow up equally necessary.
Test Setup
We tested with Windows 11 and DDR4 retention on a Z690 motherboard (B660 isn't available still). We're using a publicly-available BIOS that allows the bit to meet its rated specifications, but information technology is possible that hereafter BIOS releases could unlock an extra scrap of performance. Additionally, the ability monitoring software that we typically employ isn't all the same optimized for the 12400's ability telemetry. As such, nosotros simply take sparse power metrics and they could exist subject to a bit of variance. We'll update the article with more than detailed ability measurements once we've sorted that event.
The Cadre i5-12400 is a locked chip, merely you can overclock the retentiveness on Z- and B-series motherboards. We're sticking with our standard policy of allowing the motherboard to exceed Intel's recommended power limits, provided the chip remains within warrantied operating atmospheric condition. Some of our tests apply the default lifted PL1 and PL2 restrictions. Most all enthusiast-course motherboards come with similar settings, so this reflects the out-of-box experience with a loftier-end motherboard. These lifted ability limits tin can serve as a sort of quasi-overclock (admitting not as effective) that will heave performance in some threaded applications and gaming, all while technically remaining inside the definition of stock settings, and thus warrantied. We measured a peak of 98W with the unlimited power settings during a Blender workload, simply nosotros'll follow up with more detailed power stats soon.
Naturally, these lifted power limits equate to more ability consumption, and thus more heat. MSI motherboards also come up with a recommended power profile for a stock cooler, which we put to the examination to compare performance. All the same, we don't have a stock cooler for the Core i5-12400 all the same, then nosotros used this contour with the Corsair H115i watercooler that we use as a standard on our examination benches. We'll add testing with the stock cooler to this article in one case it arrives. MSI claims the boxed cooler can sustain these settings, just the MTP/PL2 of 169W (128-second Turbo duration) is higher up Intel's recommended 117W / 56-2nd boost. We measured a peak of 86W with these settings. We'll add together testing with the stock cooler at both 169W/117W MTP settings soon.
We tested the Core i5-12400 in 3 different configurations:
- Cadre i5-12400 NoPL DDR4-3800: Corsair H115i 280mm water cooler, power limits removed, memory overclocked to DDR4-3800 in Gear i mode (Gear two results in functioning regressions)
- Core i5-12400: Corsair H115i 280mm water libation, power limits removed, Stock DDR4-3200 in Gear 1
- Core i5-12400 StockPL: Corsair H115i 280mm water libation, PL1=65W, PL2=169W, 128-second boost (Tau), Stock DDR4-3200 in Gear 1
We also tested with secure boot, virtualization support, and fTPM/PTT active to reverberate a properly configured Windows 11 install. We have a total breakup of the test system configurations at the end of the commodity.
Intel Core i5-12400 Gaming Benchmarks — The TLDR
As usual, we're testing with an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 to reduce GPU-imposed bottlenecks as much equally possible, and differences between test subjects will compress with lesser cards or college resolutions. Because most of the titles below bear witness little meaningful differentiation at higher resolutions, we only tested iv of the vii titles at 1440p.
Paired with affordable DDR4 retention at the 1080p resolution, the previous-gen flagship $584 Core i9-11900K is a scant 2.5% faster than the ~$185 Cadre i5-12400, but tuning the Core i5's memory to DDR4-3800 gives it a 1.nine% atomic number 82 over the stock 11900K in our cumulative performance measurement. Naturally, the Cadre i9-11900K would have the lead after overclocking, but it'southward impressive that the 12400 tin even compete, permit lonely beat, the stock 11900K. The 12400 also beat the Core i7-11700K and Core i5-11400 by 4.v% and 8.4%, respectively, and so the resale value of Rocket Lake fries just dropped fifty-fifty more.
At stock settings, the Cadre i5-12400 is 1.9% faster than AMD's venerable ~$299 Ryzen v 5600X. After tuning, the Core i5-12400 ties the overclocked 5600X, an impressive showing for a chip that costs $110 less.
It feels unfair to compare the Ryzen 5 5600G to the Cadre i5-12400; AMD's APU isn't designed as a direct competitor and is more than expensive than the 12400. Withal, aside from the Ryzen 5 3600X and 3600, the $249 5600G is the only AMD processor shut to this price class. Regardless, with a discrete GPU, the Core i5-12400 is 16.8% faster than the 5600G and 14% faster after tuning both fries.
The Ryzen 5 3600X and 3600 also feel like odd comparisons to the 12400 — both are several years one-time and take the previous-gen Zen two architecture. Merely, once again, these are the only suitable comparables from the AMD camp. The Cadre i5-12400 is 22.vii% and 26% faster than the Ryzen v 3600X and 3600, respectively. As y'all can imagine, overclocking the Ryzen fries doesn't practise much to close that chasm.
At stock settings, the Core i5-12600K is 2.5% faster than the 12400, a relatively slim lead given its ~$105 premium over the 12400. (However, we shouldn't underestimate the power of the 12600K's E-cores for game streaming.) Interestingly, turning off the 12600K'south East-cores, essentially making information technology a 12400 with college clocks, boosts its pb over the 12400 to 7.three%.
The Core i5-12400 gains iv.5% more performance from overclocked memory but withal trails the more-expensive overclocked Core i5-12600K quite a flake (we received a 15% improvement from overclocking the Alder Lake 12600K). After tuning, the Core i5-12600K is xi.5% faster than the 12400, significant the Core i5-12600K earns its toll tag for overclockers.
| Tom'south Hardware | 1080p Game Benchmarks - fps %age |
| Core i9-12900K DDR4 | 100% |
| Core i9-12700K DDR4 | 98.9% |
| Core i5-12400 noPL DDR4-3800 | 92% |
| Core i5-12600K DDR4 | xc.3% |
| Core i9-11900K | 90.3% |
| Core i5-12400 | 88% |
| Cadre i5-12400 StockPL | 86.9% |
| Core i5-11700K | 84% |
| Ryzen v 5600G | 73.i% |
| Ryzen 5 3600X | 68% |
We haven't tested the Core i5-12400 with DDR5 memory yet — we'll wait for an appropriate B660 motherboard — just we've observed that DDR4 is generally comparable to DDR5 in gaming with variances that depend on the championship. Additionally, DDR5 is currently subject to eye-watering price premiums that completely remove it equally a rational choice for this grade of chip.
Naturally, moving over to 1440p brings a GPU bottleneck into the equation, and then the performance deltas between the chips compress tremendously. If you lot game at college resolutions and don't plan to upgrade your GPU earlier you buy your next CPU, those results provide a good perspective.
Flipping through the 99th percentile charts for both resolutions also shows larger deltas, only we take to view those with circumspection as Windows xi is even so immature and seems to suffer from more framerate variability than our Windows 10 exam platform.
The Core i5-12400 easily beats the Ryzen comparables, but be enlightened that large performance deltas in a few of the game titles tin can heavily impact these types of overall measurements. It'due south always all-time to make an informed conclusion based on the types of titles yous play oftentimes, so exist sure to cheque out the individual game benchmarks below.
Overall it'south clear that the Core i5-12400 is at present the mid-range gaming champion, offering a superior level of performance at its price point with no articulate competitors.
3DMark, VRMark, Chess Engines on Intel Core i5-12400
Constructed benchmarks don't tend to translate well to real-world gaming, just they do show us the raw amount of compute power exposed to game engines. It's likewise bad near games don't fully exploit it.
Far Cry 6 on Cadre i5-12400
F1 2021 on Intel Core i5-12400
Hitman 3 on Core i5-12400
Horizon Zero Dawn on Core i5-12400
Microsoft Flying Simulator 2021 on Core i5-12400
Red Dead Redemption 2 on Cadre i5-12400
Sentinel Dogs Legion on Core i5-12400
Core i5-12400 Awarding Benchmarks — The TLDR
We tin can boil down productivity awarding performance into two broad categories: unmarried- and multi-threaded. These slides show the geometric hateful of performance in several of our most important tests in each category, but exist sure to look at the expanded benchmark results further below.
The Core i5-12400 is impressive in our cumulative measure of single-threaded performance. Equally expected, we don't see any meaningful differences betwixt the 12400's dissimilar power settings, but the 12400 doesn't need too much assist. The chip is ii.iii% faster than the Core i9-11900K, half-dozen% faster than the 11700K, and an incredible 15.vii% faster than the 11400.
Zooming out to the Ryzen comparables reveals that the 12400 is 13.5% faster than the Ryzen 5 5600G in single-threaded work (ten% faster after tuning the 5600G), and a whopping 24% and 27% faster than the Ryzen v 3600X and 3600, respectively. You'll have to look to other Alder Lake chips to find faster performance in single-threaded piece of work — equally you can see in our CPU Criterion bureaucracy, even the vaunted Ryzen 9 5950X isn't equally fast as the Core i5-12400 in single-threaded work.
We can see the advantage of uncorking the power restrictions in threaded workloads, every bit the Core i5-12400 is 7% faster after our alterations. That said, nosotros see a unlike picture in threaded productivity work where the 12400 obviously isn't in the same league as Ryzen ix chips.
Nonetheless, the 12400 is even so plenty competitive against the Ryzen 5 models, fifty-fifty beating the vaunted Ryzen five 5600X past 2.iii% at standard settings and 6.seven% afterwards tuning both fries. That's impressive given the 12400's much more forgiving cost tag, but as you'll see in the benchmarks beneath, the Ryzen v 5600X does carve out wins in more than a few threaded applications.
Nosotros see larger gains over the Ryzen 5 5600G, 3600X and 3600, with the stock 12400 taking leads of 15.8%, 22.four%, and 23.6%, respectively. Frankly, AMD merely doesn't have any worthy competing chips at this price point for this blazon of work.
The Core i5-12600K earns its price tag for threaded productivity tasks: The 12600K is ~21.seven% faster in threaded work than the 12400, and that percentage climbs in some workloads. As you lot can encounter past the results with the 12600K's E-cores disabled, those tiny little Due east-cores pull a lot of weight in threaded work. Overall, the 12600K is 12.iii% faster with the E-cores active than it is with them disabled.
The 12400 may not have as much threaded heft as the 12600K because of its lack of Eastward-cores, just it does pretty well confronting the previous-gen Core i5-11400 with a 12.4% lead. As expected, information technology can't proceed step with the 11900K and 11700K in threaded piece of work.
Overall the Cadre i5-12400 offers a wonderful alloy of operation in both single- and multi-threaded apps given its price point. You'll have to look to Intel'due south own Alder Lake family unit for faster single-threaded performance, and the 12400 beats the price-comparable Ryzen models (and even the $110 more expensive Ryzen five 5600X) in threaded applications by convincing margins.
| Tom's Hardware - Awarding Benchmarks | Single-Threaded | Multi-Threaded |
| Core i9-12900K DDR4 | 100% | 100% |
| Cadre i9-12700K DDR4 | 97.3% | 85.7% |
| Core i5-12600K DDR4 | 95.9% | 66.half-dozen% |
| Core i5-12400 noPL DDR4-3800 | 87.one% | 52.2% |
| Core i5-12400 | 86.nine% | 52.2% |
| Cadre i5-12400 StockPL | 87.ane% | 48.eight% |
| Cadre i9-11900K | 84.9% | 63.3% |
| Cadre i5-11700K | 81.8% | 63.9% |
| Ryzen five 5600G | 75.1% | 43.9% |
| Ryzen 5 3600X | 66% | 40.v% |
Rendering Benchmarks on Core i5-12400
AMD's onslaught against Intel began with a commanding pb in rendering piece of work, specially Cinebench. Notwithstanding, that lead has waned with the inflow of Alder Lake, as the Core i5-12400 takes a somewhat slim pb over the Ryzen 5 5600X in both the Cinebench single- and multi-threaded tests while taking much more substantial leads over the 5600G, 3600X, and 3600.
The 12400 is particularly strong in single-threaded rendering tasks merely every bit adept in the threaded benchmarks. Overall, the Core i5-12400 dominates the comparably-priced Ryzen chips in these tests.
AMD's strongest showing in these tests comes from the $300 Ryzen 5 5600X during the C-Ray and Corona benchmarks. The 5600X is as well strong in the iv Blender renders, but it wins two and loses two, equating to a wash.
Encoding Benchmarks on Core i5-12400
Web Browsing on Intel Core i5-12400
The ubiquitous web browser is ane of the well-nigh frequently used applications. These tests tend to be lightly threaded, then a snappy response fourth dimension is disquisitional. The Core i5-12400 beats all competing Ryzen processors in Jetstream two and ARES-vi, but the Ryzen five 5600X edges past in WebXPRT three.
The Microsoft Edge browser is our lone example of a browser that benefits from threaded horsepower. Hither the Core i5-12400 beats all competing Ryzen chips, proving it is quite versatile in browser work.
Adobe Premiere Pro, Photoshop, and Lightroom on Cadre i5-12400
We've integrated the UL Benchmarks Procyon tests into our suite to supersede the aging PCMark 10. This new benchmark runs circuitous Adobe Premiere Pro, Photoshop, and Lightroom workflows with the actual software, making for a not bad existent-world test suite.
The Cadre i5-12400 trails the Ryzen 5 5600X and overclocked 5600G in the Adobe Premiere Pro video editing benchmarks but takes the lead in the Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop photograph editing benchmarks.
Office and Productivity on Core i5-12400
The Core i5-12400 provides snappy application load times, but the Ryzen 5 5600G and 5600X are faster, which isn't too surprising given their college price points. Conversely, the 12400 beats all of the competing Ryzen chips in the Microsoft Office suite.
Compilation, Pinch, AVX Benchmarks on Cadre i5-12400
This grab bag of diverse tests finds the Cadre i5-12400 scoring several more wins. From the exceedingly branchy code in the LLVM compilation workload to the massively parallel molecular dynamics simulation code in NAMD, the 12400 is impressive.
Meanwhile, AMD'southward higher-finish Ryzen 5 5600X carves out wins in the NAMD, compression/decompression, and encryption workloads. Still, all of the price-comparable Ryzen models trail the Core i5-12400 across the entire gamut of tests.
Mid-range Gaming Dominance
Like the remainder of the Alder Lake family, the Cadre i5-12400 will come up to market with disruptive pricing as part of Intel's new bare-knuckle toll war with AMD. That'southward particularly painful every bit Intel attacks the sub-$200 segment that AMD has largely abased.
The ~$185 Cadre i5-12400 beats the $299 Ryzen 5 5600X and $259 Ryzen 5 5600G in fundamental areas. Putting the Cadre i5-12400 up against AMD's toll-comparable models isn't a off-white fight; the Core i5-12400 beats them by huge margins, simply that's because the $240 Ryzen 5 3600X and $199 Ryzen v 3600 leverage the aging Zen 2 architecture.
They're also facing a tremendous competitor. Consider this: With the right tuning, the 12400 is fifty-fifty slightly faster at 1080p gaming than the previous-gen $549 Core i9-11900K flagship at stock settings, which is impressive.
Intel'due south Alder Lake pricing is solid, but the company'south decision to initially bring only Z690 motherboards to market took a bit of the shine off the value proffer at launch. Withal, we're on the cusp of the release of the more affordable B- and H-series motherboards, which should bring a much lower cost of entry to the Alder Lake platform. Unfortunately, we don't accept details of those motherboards to share nevertheless, but we're certain that you'll learn more than in the coming days.
Below, we accept the geometric mean of our gaming test suite at 1080p and 1440p and a cumulative measure out of functioning in single- and multi-threaded applications. Remember that we conducted the gaming tests with an RTX 3090, so functioning deltas will shrink with lesser cards and higher resolution and allegiance settings.
The Cadre i5-12400 eschews the hybrid Alder Lake design, instead going with only six P-cores. That doesn't hold the chip back in gaming, though, and the Core i5-12400 now reigns as the mid-range gaming CPU champ.
There are a lot of impressive 12400 gaming stats to throw around, only some are more than telling than others. For instance, the Cadre i5-12400 is ane.ix% faster than AMD's venerable ~$299 Ryzen 5 5600X at stock settings. Overclocking both fries yields a tie, an impressive showing considering the 12400 costs ~$110 less. The Core i5-12400 is besides 16.viii% faster than the $250 Ryzen v 5600G.
AMD's decision to prioritize higher-end, higher-margin chips makes good concern sense, merely it leaves the unabridged high-book budget segment to Intel. As a result, AMD'south Zen 2-powered $240 Ryzen 5 3600X and $200 Ryzen five 3600 are the company'southward only toll-comparable chips. They're woefully unprepared for the onslaught: The Core i5-12400 is 22.7% and 26% faster in 1080p gaming than the Ryzen 5 3600X and 3600, respectively.
The 12400 is only as impressive in lightly-threaded apps. In fact, non a single Ryzen processor beat the Core i5-12400 in our cumulative measure of unmarried-threaded performance, and that includes the $800 Ryzen 9 5950X. The margins against AMD'south comparable chips aren't slim, either. Yous'll have to wait to other Alder Lake fries to detect faster performance in single-threaded work.
The Core i5-12400's generational improvements in threaded work are a bit tamer. It is 'but' 12.4% faster than the previous-gen Cadre i5-11400, but we yet meet impressive performance over the Ryzen competition. Even though the 5600X carves out some wins in some applications, at stock settings, the 12400 is 2.3% faster than the 5600X in our cumulative measure out of threaded work and 6.seven% faster after overclocking. That's surprising given the pricing delta.
Frankly, AMD doesn't have whatsoever worthy competing chips for threaded work at the 12400's price point. Nosotros come across larger leads for the 12400 over the Ryzen v 5600G, 3600X, and 3600, with the Core i5-12400 taking leads of 15.eight%, 22.4%, and 23.6%, respectively.
That means the Cadre i5-12400 wins against the price-comparable Ryzen chips in every performance category, and even beats a few of the more expensive models. Of course, you also have to consider that you can go the graphics-less Core i5-12400F for ~$25 less. That'southward an excellent price point for admission to this level of performance.
Given the 12400's impressive price-to-performance ratio, the question becomes whether it'south worth it to step up to the Cadre i5-12600K. If you're focused primarily on gaming, the Core i5-12600K is two.5% faster at stock settings, which isn't worth the premium. Nonetheless, the 12600K earns its cost tag if you're overclocking. The 12600K is one of the best overclockers nosotros've seen in several chip gens, delivering up to 15% higher gaming performance after tuning. That gives it an 11.5% lead over a tuned 12400. The 12600K too proves its worth in threaded applications, where it is ~21.seven% faster than the 12400, primarily on the strength of its four additional E-cores.
The Core i5-12400 has a much more than modernistic platform than AMD's AM4 ecosystem. Leading-edge DDR5 and PCIe v.0 interfaces add together some toll, but back up for DDR4 B660 motherboards helps reduce that overhead. Y'all won't demand DDR5 retention to unlock the best gaming performance, and that's a good affair because DDR5'southward high pricing doesn't make sense for this course of chip.
Alder Lake has delivered a decisive accident to AMD's entire Ryzen 5000 family. AMD volition respond with its 3D V-Enshroud processors with upwards to 192MB of L3 enshroud per fleck, imparting up to xv% more gaming functioning. Those chips arrive this year, but we're not sure if the added premium of the 3D V-Cache tech will make it worth manufacturing souped-up Ryzen 5 models to compete with the Core i5-12400. Time will tell.
The 12400 serves upwards solid performance in all manner of threaded productivity applications, and its snappy single-threaded performance beats even the fastest Ryzen 5000 processors. Additionally, the Core i5-12400 delivers incredible levels of gaming operation but at a much lower toll bespeak than any comparable AMD processor, setting a new bar for mid-range gaming chips. For gamers looking for the best value, the Core i5-12400 is now the uncontested best mid-range CPU for gaming, while the Cadre i5-12600K is the best option for overclockers.
| Intel Socket 1700 DDR4 (Z690) | Core i7-12700K, Core i5-12600K, Core i5-12400 |
| MSI Z690A WiFi DDR4 | |
| 2x 8GB Trident Z Royal DDR4-3600 - Stock: DDR4-3200 14-fourteen-14-36 | |
| Intel Socket 1200 (Z590) | Core i9-11900K, Core i7-11700K, Cadre i5-11400 |
| MSI Z590 Godlike | |
| 2x 8GB Trident Z Royal DDR4-3600 - Stock DDR4-3200/2933 Gear i | |
| AMD Socket AM4 (X570) | Ryzen 5 5600X, 5600G, 3600X, 3600 |
| | MSI MEG X570 Godlike |
| 2x 8GB Trident Z Royal DDR4-3600 - Stock: DDR4-3200 fourteen-14-fourteen-36 | |
| All Systems | Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3090 Eagle - Gaming and ProViz applications |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti FE - Application tests | |
| | 2TB Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus |
| | Silverstone ST1100-TI |
| Open Benchtable | |
| Arctic MX-4 TIM | |
| Windows xi Pro | |
| Cooling | Corsair H115i, Custom loop |
- MORE: Best CPUs for Gaming
- MORE: CPU Criterion Hierarchy
- More than: AMD vs Intel
- MORE: All CPUs Content
0 Response to "Sumner Street Home Hardware Elon 4/5" Centre Bar Pull"
Post a Comment